Opinion
Docket No. 144913.COA No. 309447.
2012-04-27
Megan SMITH, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellees, v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DIRECTOR, Defendant–Appellant.
Prior report: 491 Mich. 898, 810 N.W.2d 384.
Order
On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration and motion to permit filing a reply brief are GRANTED. The motion for reconsideration or clarification of this Court's April 13, 2012 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
MARKMAN, J., dissenting.
For the reasons stated in my dissenting statement of April 13, 2012, I would grant defendant's motion for reconsideration and then grant either its motion to bypass the Court of Appeals or its motion for a stay.