The remand order required the recalculation of the plaintiff's damages to account for the effect of the defendant's FY2013 commission plan. See Smith v. DecisionOne Corp., 98 Mass.App.Ct. 1106 (2020). The defendant argues that the judge's decision after remand misapplied the FY2013 plan and violated the panel's remand order, overpaid the plaintiff for commissions due under the FY2010 plan, and wrongly awarded him bonuses under the FY2010 plan.