From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Davis

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 25, 2012
471 F. App'x 195 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-7687

04-25-2012

CHARLES JERALL SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WALTER DAVIS, a/k/a W. Davis, Defendant - Appellee, and B. LARGE; W. INGLE; T. MCCOY; D. TATE; TRACY S. RAY; JOHN GARMAN; T. TRAPP; D. MCCOWAN, Defendants.

Charles Jerall Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:10-cv-00263-SGW-RSB)

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Jerall Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles Jerall Smith appeals a district court's final order entering judgment in the Appellee's favor in accordance with the jury's resolution of the factual issues. Smith contends that the trial testimony established that the Appellee used excessive force. We have reviewed the record and find no reason to disturb the jury's verdict. We note that Smith does not challenge the district court's order dismissing his other claims upon consideration of the Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Smith v. Davis

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 25, 2012
471 F. App'x 195 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Smith v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES JERALL SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WALTER DAVIS, a/k/a W…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 25, 2012

Citations

471 F. App'x 195 (4th Cir. 2012)