From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Davidson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 8, 2013
No. 10-13898 (E.D. Mich. May. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. 10-13898

05-08-2013

SAM SMITH III, Plaintiff, v. LYNN M. DAVIDSON, ET AL., Defendants.


District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith


Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen


ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Sam Smith's Motion to Compel Discovery [Doc. #35], in which he seeks discovery responses from Defendants Wendling and Messing. These Defendants have responded that while they believe that they mailed their responses, an office fire has since destroyed their copy of the responses. Defendants state that they are in the process of recreating those responses.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel [Doc. #35] is GRANTED. Defendants Wendling and Messing will recreate their discovery responses and produce them the Plaintiff within 21 days of the date of this Order.

Plaintiff's request for expenses incurred in bringing this motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on May 8, 2013, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail.

Michael Williams

Relief Case Manager for the Honorable

R. Steven Whalen


Summaries of

Smith v. Davidson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 8, 2013
No. 10-13898 (E.D. Mich. May. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Smith v. Davidson

Case Details

Full title:SAM SMITH III, Plaintiff, v. LYNN M. DAVIDSON, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 8, 2013

Citations

No. 10-13898 (E.D. Mich. May. 8, 2013)