From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Daniels

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 9, 2023
3:20-cv-00299-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Aug. 9, 2023)

Opinion

3:20-cv-00299-MMD-CSD

08-09-2023

JACOB SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES DANIELS, et al., Defendants.

AARON D. FORD Attorney General By: DOUGLAS R. RANDS, Bar No. 3572 Senior Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants


AARON D. FORD Attorney General By: DOUGLAS R. RANDS, Bar No. 3572 Senior Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, Jacob Smith, pro se, and Defendants, Daniel Mondragon, Justin Henley and David Craig by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, and Douglas R. Rands, Senior Deputy Attorney General, hereby stipulate that the above-captioned action should be dismissed with prejudice by order of this Court, with each party to bear his own costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Daniels

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 9, 2023
3:20-cv-00299-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Aug. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. Daniels

Case Details

Full title:JACOB SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES DANIELS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 9, 2023

Citations

3:20-cv-00299-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Aug. 9, 2023)