From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Craig-Rohan

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 16, 2023
2:18-cv-02207-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 16, 2023)

Opinion

2:18-cv-02207-JAD-VCF

02-16-2023

Michael Smith, Plaintiff v. Christy Craig-Rohan, et al., Defendants


ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Jennifer A. Dorsey, U.S. District Judge

On July 29, 2022, the defendant filed a suggestion of death upon the record, alerting the court that Plaintiff Michael Smith had died. I then filed an order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1), indicating that any appropriate substitution motion had to be filed by October 26, 2022, “or this case will be dismissed under Rule 25 without further prior notice.”Because no substitution motion-or anything else for that matter-has since been filed, IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED under FRCP 25. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.

ECF No. 48.

ECF No. 49.


Summaries of

Smith v. Craig-Rohan

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 16, 2023
2:18-cv-02207-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. Craig-Rohan

Case Details

Full title:Michael Smith, Plaintiff v. Christy Craig-Rohan, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 16, 2023

Citations

2:18-cv-02207-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 16, 2023)