From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 1, 2012
2:11-cv-01697-PMP-GWF (D. Nev. Nov. 1, 2012)

Opinion

2:11-cv-01697-PMP-GWF

11-01-2012

TONY M. SMITH, Petitioner, v. GREGORY COX, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which petitioner, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se. The petition is currently pending before the court for resolution on the merits. In order to address the merits, the court requires additional records from petitioner's criminal trial. Respondents' main argument set forth in their answer is that the use of the so-called Kazalyn jury instruction on first-degree murder was harmless error. The court cannot fathom how respondents determined that at least an entire day of the transcript of the jury trial-particularly the day that both the defendant testified and that the jury heard the taped, prior inconsistent statement of his former co-defendant-was not relevant to the adjudication of this petition.

At any rate, the court orders respondents to file a supplemental exhibit containing the full and complete trial transcript from petitioner's jury trial, including the trial transcript dated December 3, 1998, the jury verdict, the jury instructions, all proposed jury instructions, and the transcript of any hearings pertaining to the jury instructions within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 1, 2012
2:11-cv-01697-PMP-GWF (D. Nev. Nov. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Smith v. Cox

Case Details

Full title:TONY M. SMITH, Petitioner, v. GREGORY COX, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 1, 2012

Citations

2:11-cv-01697-PMP-GWF (D. Nev. Nov. 1, 2012)