From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Feb 8, 2022
No. 9799-21 (U.S.T.C. Feb. 8, 2022)

Opinion

9799-21

02-08-2022

Randy E. Smith Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge

On October 20, 2021, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction on the ground that petitioner paid the tax liability for tax year 2018 before the issuance of the notice of deficiency, and, therefore, the notice of deficiency on which this case is based is invalid. Although the Court provided petitioner an opportunity to file an objection, if any, to respondent's motion, no response has been received from petitioner.

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the notice of deficiency on which this case is based is invalid.


Summaries of

Smith v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Feb 8, 2022
No. 9799-21 (U.S.T.C. Feb. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Randy E. Smith Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Feb 8, 2022

Citations

No. 9799-21 (U.S.T.C. Feb. 8, 2022)