Smith v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Full title: TAYLOR SMITH, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Court: United States Tax Court

Date published: Jul 30, 2024

No. 16689-23L (U.S.T.C. Jul. 30, 2024)

Opinion

16689-23L

07-30-2024

TAYLOR SMITH, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Cary Douglas Pugh Judge.

ORDER

Cary Douglas Pugh Judge.

This case is currently set for trial at the Court's September 9, 2024, Los Angeles, California trial session. On July 26, 2024, respondent filed a Motion for Extension of Time to Comply with the Requirements of Tax Court Rule 93(b), seeking additional time to file a Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record, and lodged a copy of the supplement along with an unsigned certificate of genuineness of the administrative record which was mistitled "Declaration of UNSIGNED in Support of Motion for Extension of Time". Upon due consideration and for cause, it is hereby

ORDERED that respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to Comply with the Requirements of Tax Court Rule 93(b), filed July 26, 2024, is granted and the time in which respondent has to comply with the requirements of Tax Court Rule 93(b), is extended to August 19, 2024. It is further

ORDERED that the Declaration of UNSIGNED in Support of Motion for Extension of Time, lodged July 26, 2024, is retitled "Certificate of Genuineness of the Administrative Record". It is further

ORDERED that, on or before August 5, 2024, the parties shall contact the chambers of the undersigned to schedule a pretrial conference to discuss the status of this case.