From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Comm'r

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Sep 4, 2019
No. 18-3560 (8th Cir. Sep. 4, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-3560

09-04-2019

Doyle Dennis Smith Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


Appeal from The United States Tax Court [Unpublished] Before BENTON, SHEPHERD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Doyle Smith appeals the tax court's dismissal of his petition after he failed to pay the filing fee. Following careful review, we conclude that the tax court did not err in dismissing Smith's petition. See Tax Ct. Rule 20(d) (fee of $60 shall be paid at time petition is filed; fee may be waived if petitioner shows inability to pay); Tax Ct. Rule 123(b) (tax court may dismiss case for petitioner's failure to prosecute or failure to comply with Tax Court Rules); Long v. Comm'r, 742 F.2d 1141, 1143 (8th Cir. 1984) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal under Rule 123(b)). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable Maurice B. Foley, Chief Judge, United States Tax Court.


Summaries of

Smith v. Comm'r

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Sep 4, 2019
No. 18-3560 (8th Cir. Sep. 4, 2019)
Case details for

Smith v. Comm'r

Case Details

Full title:Doyle Dennis Smith Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Sep 4, 2019

Citations

No. 18-3560 (8th Cir. Sep. 4, 2019)