From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Jan 23, 1942
158 S.W.2d 393 (Ky. Ct. App. 1942)

Opinion

January 23, 1942.

Appeal from Clay Circuit Court.

Franklin P. Stivers, Judge.

Roy W. House for appellants.

Hubert Meredith, Attorney General, and H. Appleton Federa, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Dismissing appeal.

The appellants were convicted of attempting to set fire to a dwelling house, the offense denounced by Section 1171, Kentucky Statutes, and their punishment fixed by the jury at one year's confinement in the penitentiary. However, no judgment was entered upon the verdict and no sentence imposed by the court. All parties to the appeal agree that the appeal is premature and must be dismissed under the authority of Jones v. Commonwealth, 238 Ky. 607, 38 S.W.2d 461.

Since the order book discloses the return of the verdict and the contents of the verdict, there is sufficient record evidence to justify the entry of a judgment nunc pro tunc. Thereafter, the appellants may appeal, and, if they so desire, utilize for that purpose the record now filed in this Court.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Smith v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Jan 23, 1942
158 S.W.2d 393 (Ky. Ct. App. 1942)
Case details for

Smith v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:Smith et al. v. Commonwealth

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Jan 23, 1942

Citations

158 S.W.2d 393 (Ky. Ct. App. 1942)
158 S.W.2d 393

Citing Cases

Harris v. Commonwealth

This court has many times approved the entry of a nunc pro tunc judgment and stated it to be the duty of the…