From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Collins

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division
May 15, 2006
4:06CV97-MMP/AK (N.D. Fla. May. 15, 2006)

Opinion

4:06CV97-MMP/AK.

May 15, 2006


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and filed for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Docs. 1 and 2).

The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), provides that a prisoner may not bring a civil action in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915:

. . . if the prisoner has, on 3 or more occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Plaintiff has had at least three prior prisoner actions dismissed within this District alone on the grounds that they were frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim. The dismissed cases include: Case No. 5:02cv43 (dismissed for being frivolous and for submitting a false complaint form); Case No. 5:02cv22 (dismissed for abuse of the judicial process, again for failing to list all his previous cases); 5:02cv44 (dismissed as frivolous); and Case No. 4:06cv98 (dismissed on three strikes grounds-report lists a number of other cases where dismissal occurred because Plaintiff has not complied with court orders).

The instant complaint has been reviewed enough to discern that Plaintiff's allegations do not bring him within the "imminent danger" exception. See (Doc. 1).

Because Plaintiff has had at least three prior dismissals and is not under imminent danger of serious physical injury, he is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. Furthermore, because Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee at the time he submitted this civil rights action, this case must be dismissed. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has clarified that the proper procedure in such a situation is not to give the inmate time in which to pay the fee, rather dismissal is required if a "three striker" does not pay the filing fee at the time he submits the complaint. Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234 (11th Cir. 2002). Thus, this case must be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).


Summaries of

Smith v. Collins

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division
May 15, 2006
4:06CV97-MMP/AK (N.D. Fla. May. 15, 2006)
Case details for

Smith v. Collins

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE ALBERT SMITH, Plaintiff, v. LEONA J. COLLINS, et al, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division

Date published: May 15, 2006

Citations

4:06CV97-MMP/AK (N.D. Fla. May. 15, 2006)