From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Cohn

Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler
Aug 10, 2022
No. 12-22-00199-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 10, 2022)

Opinion

12-22-00199-CV

08-10-2022

MARY J. SMITH, APPELLANT v. EDWARD COHN, APPELLEE


APPEAL FROM THE 349TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT HOUSTON COUNTY, TEXAS (Tr. Ct. No. 21-0158)

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

A party who is not excused by statute or the appellate rules from paying costs must pay--at the time an item is presented for filing--whatever fees are required by statute or Texas Supreme Court order. Tex.R.App.P. 5. An appellate court may enforce Rule 5 by any order that is just. Id. After giving ten days' notice, an appellate court may dismiss an appeal because the appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time. Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(c).

On July 18, 2022, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant, Mary J. Smith, that the filing fee in this appeal is due. Appellant was informed that failure to remit the filing fee on or before July 28, would result in the Court's taking appropriate action, including dismissal of the case without further notice. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). The date for remitting the filing fee passed, and Appellant has not responded to this Court's notice, paid the filing fee, or otherwise shown that she is excused from paying the fee.

The case information sheet from the Houston County District Clerk's Office reflects that Appellant has not been declared indigent.

Because Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

We also note that Appellant's pro se notice of appeal fails to contain the information specifically required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and Section 51.017(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5 (service); see also Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.017(a) (West Supp. 2019) (notice of appeal must be served on each court reporter responsible for preparing reporter's record).

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.


Summaries of

Smith v. Cohn

Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler
Aug 10, 2022
No. 12-22-00199-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. Cohn

Case Details

Full title:MARY J. SMITH, APPELLANT v. EDWARD COHN, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler

Date published: Aug 10, 2022

Citations

No. 12-22-00199-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 10, 2022)