From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 7, 2008
CIV-S-08-0673-LEW-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. May. 7, 2008)

Opinion

CIV-S-08-0673-LEW-CMK-P.

May 7, 2008

EDMUND G. BROWN Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, DANE R. GILLETTE, Chief Assistant Attorney General, MICHAEL P. FARRELL, Senior Assistant Attorney General, STEPHEN G. HERNDON, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, DAWN MORTAZAVI, Deputy Attorney General, State Bar No. 223230, Sacramento, CA, Attorneys for Respondent.


ORDER


Respondents have filed a request to modify the briefing schedule.

1. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that Respondents' request is hereby granted.

2. The scheduling order is hereby modified for Respondents to file a response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus within thirty days from the date of this order.


Summaries of

Smith v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 7, 2008
CIV-S-08-0673-LEW-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. May. 7, 2008)
Case details for

Smith v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:DONNY DeSHAWN SMITH, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 7, 2008

Citations

CIV-S-08-0673-LEW-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. May. 7, 2008)