From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 2, 2019
CASE NO. CV 18-10454-JLS (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2019)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 18-10454-JLS (PJW)

07-02-2019

JOSEPH EDWARD SMITH, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Final Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. No objections were filed. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge's Final Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Final Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that the court erred in its procedural ruling and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

DATED: July 2, 2019.

/s/_________

JOSEPHINE L. STATON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 2, 2019
CASE NO. CV 18-10454-JLS (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2019)
Case details for

Smith v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH EDWARD SMITH, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 2, 2019

Citations

CASE NO. CV 18-10454-JLS (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2019)