From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. City of Oakland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 11, 2011
No. 3:07-cv-6298 MHP (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

No. 3:07-cv-6298 MHP.

October 11, 2011

John J. Verber, State Bar No. 139917, Aimee Hamoy-Perera, State Bar No. 221228, BURNHAM BROWN, A Professional Law Corporation, Oakland, California, Attorneys for Defendant, INGO MAYER.


PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING IN PART JOINT STIPULATION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING AND SUBMISSION OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES


Complaint Filed: December 27, 2011

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

PLEASE TAKE NOTE that the Joint Stipulation for Supplemental Briefing and Submission of Evidence in Support of Punitive Damages was considered by this Court.

THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that the Stipulation be GRANTED. IN PART. The parties shall file simulataneous briefs on or before October 17, 2011 There will be no continuances.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. City of Oakland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 11, 2011
No. 3:07-cv-6298 MHP (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Smith v. City of Oakland

Case Details

Full title:JOHN SMITH, KIRBY BRADSHAW, SPENCER LUCAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

No. 3:07-cv-6298 MHP (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)