From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 20, 1990
158 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

February 20, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Marbach, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff, a Bronx resident, was a passenger on the appellants' bus when it collided with a New York City sanitation truck at an intersection in The Bronx. She allegedly sustained personal injuries, and brought suit against the defendants, setting venue in The Bronx pursuant to CPLR 503 (a) and 504 (3). The defendant County of Westchester and Liberty Lines Transit, Inc., moved for a change of venue, arguing that CPLR 504 (1) as well as 510 (3) mandated a transfer of venue to Westchester County. Their motion was denied.

Where statutory venue provisions are in conflict, the court may, under its discretionary powers, change or retain venue upon considerations set forth in CPLR 510 (3) of "the convenience of * * * witnesses and the ends of justice" (see, McAdoo v Levinson, 143 A.D.2d 819; Weissmandl v Murray Walter, Inc., 147 A.D.2d 474). The appellants relied upon CPLR 504 (1), which states that the place of trial of an action against a county shall be "in such county". They failed to present grounds pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) to support a transfer. The lack of opposition by the City of New York to the appellants' motion cannot be construed as a waiver, as the burden fell upon plaintiff to sustain her choice of venue. The determination of the Supreme Court was an appropriate exercise of its discretion (see, McAdoo v Levinson, supra). Mollen, P.J., Brown, Kooper and Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 20, 1990
158 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Smith v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:EUNICE SMITH, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant, and COUNTY OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 20, 1990

Citations

158 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
551 N.Y.S.2d 565

Citing Cases

Vasta v. Village of Liberty

We affirm. Although CPLR 504 (1) provides that the place for trial in a suit against a municipality "shall…

Ruiz v. City of New York

However, the law is established that the apparent statutory mandate of CPLR 504, while warranting great…