From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. City of L. A.

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 28, 2024
CV 23-4739 PA (RAOx) (C.D. Cal. May. 28, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-4739 PA (RAOx)

05-28-2024

DAMIEN D. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, ET AL., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

PERCY ANDERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In accordance with the Court's May 28, 2024 Minute Order granting, in part, the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department, and Officer Leovardo Guillen (collectively, “Defendants”) and granting the parties' August 15, 2023 Stipulation (Docket No. 17), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:

1. Defendants are entitled to summary judgment on Plaintiff's federal claims (claims one through six);

2. Plaintiff's state law claims (claims seven through eleven) are dismissed with prejudice;

3. Plaintiff's claims against defendant Chief Michel. R. Moore are dismissed with prejudice; and

4. Plaintiff shall take nothing and Defendants shall have their costs of suit.

The Clerk is ordered to enter this Judgment.


Summaries of

Smith v. City of L. A.

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 28, 2024
CV 23-4739 PA (RAOx) (C.D. Cal. May. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Smith v. City of L. A.

Case Details

Full title:DAMIEN D. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, ET AL.…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 28, 2024

Citations

CV 23-4739 PA (RAOx) (C.D. Cal. May. 28, 2024)