From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Chase Manhattan

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Mar 22, 2007
222 F. App'x 533 (8th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-1915.

Submitted: March 12, 2007.

Filed: March 22, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.

Robert L. Depper, Jr., Depper Law Firm, Eldorado, AR, Donald Richard Jones, Richard Wilensky, Wilensky Jones, Patrick J. Mulligan, Eric N. Roberson, Jason H. Fox, Reid Stewart, Law Offices of Patrick J. Mulligan, Dallas, TX, for Appellant.

Floyd M. Thomas, Jr., Matthew J. Shepherd, Compton Prewett, Danielle J. Szukala, Leann Pedersen Pope, Burke Warren, Chicago, IL, for Appellee.

Before RILEY, BOWMAN, and ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.


[UNPUBLISHED]


Plaintiff below claimed that a mortgage lender violated the Real Estate Settlement Procedure Act (RESPA), 12 U.S.C. § 2605(e)(2)(C)(i), by charging her a $5.00 fee for faxing her a payoff statement when she requested it. The district court granted summary judgment to the lender and plaintiff appealed. This case is controlled by Watt v. GMAC Mortgage Corp., 457 F.3d 781 (8th Cir. 2006), and Curran v. Washington Mut. Bank, 471 F.3d 857 (8th Cir. 2006) (per curiam), where we rejected an identical claim, and we therefore reject the claim here.

The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

We decline to address plaintiff's claim that even if a lender can charge fees in the present circumstances, such fees must be reasonable, because the claim was raised on appeal for the first time. See Watt, 457 F.3d at 784.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Smith v. Chase Manhattan

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Mar 22, 2007
222 F. App'x 533 (8th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Smith v. Chase Manhattan

Case Details

Full title:Flora J. Moseley SMITH, Appellant, v. CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Mar 22, 2007

Citations

222 F. App'x 533 (8th Cir. 2007)