From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. C.D.C. Parole Division

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 24, 2011
No. 2: 10-cv-2561 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2: 10-cv-2561 KJN P.

February 24, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is proceeding without counsel with a civil rights action. Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned. (Dkt. No. 5.)

On January 20, 2011, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to file an amended complaint in accordance with the December 9, 2010 order. Twenty-one days passed and plaintiff did not respond to the January 20, 2011 order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed.

DATED: February 23, 2011


Summaries of

Smith v. C.D.C. Parole Division

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 24, 2011
No. 2: 10-cv-2561 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Smith v. C.D.C. Parole Division

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH SMITH, Plaintiff, v. C.D.C. PAROLE DIVISION, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 24, 2011

Citations

No. 2: 10-cv-2561 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2011)