From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. C.D.C.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 2, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2919 DAD (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2919 DAD (TEMP) P.

February 2, 2011


ORDER


By order filed December 20, 2010, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

DATED: February 1, 2011.


Summaries of

Smith v. C.D.C.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 2, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2919 DAD (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Smith v. C.D.C.

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH A. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. C.D.C., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 2, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2919 DAD (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2011)