From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Cariten Insurance Company

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Greeneville
Jan 7, 2009
Case No. 2:08-cv-177 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 7, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 2:08-cv-177.

January 7, 2009


ORDER


United States Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee filed her report and recommendation [Court Doc. 31] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) on December 3, 2008. Neither party filed objections within the given 10 days.

After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Lee's report and recommendation. The Court thus ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Lee's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations [Court Doc. 31] pursuant to § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b).

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that Defendant Cariten Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss [Court Doc. 4] is GRANTED. The Court further ORDERS that Defendant Cariten Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [Court Doc. 25] is GRANTED.

The above-captioned case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Cariten Insurance Company

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Greeneville
Jan 7, 2009
Case No. 2:08-cv-177 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 7, 2009)
Case details for

Smith v. Cariten Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES K. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CARITEN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Greeneville

Date published: Jan 7, 2009

Citations

Case No. 2:08-cv-177 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 7, 2009)

Citing Cases

McCammon v. The Dollywood Found.

As the Foundation notes [Doc. 22, pg. 3], courts have repeatedly applied ERISA preemption at the…