From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Capozza

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 17, 2022
Civil Action 2:19-cv-03147-JP (E.D. Pa. Mar. 17, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:19-cv-03147-JP

03-17-2022

JON SMITH, Petitioner, v. MARK CAPOZZA, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

RICHARD A. LLORET UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

AND NOW, this 17th day of March, 2022, upon careful consideration of Petitioner Jon Smit's motion for discovery in support of his habeas petition (Doc. No. 4), the Commonwealth's response in opposition (Doc. No. 8), the Petitioner's reply memorandum (Doc. No. 9), and the evidence presented before me during a bifurcated evidentiary hearing on November 10, 2021 and March 9, 2022, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Petitioner's motion for discovery is DENIED.
2. The District Attorney shall file a specific and detailed answer to the claims in Mr. Smith's habeas petition and a supporting legal memorandum within 45 days of the date of this Order pursuant to Rule 5, 28 U.S.C. § 2254. All opinions of the Commonwealth Courts will be attached as Exhibits to the Memorandum.
3. The Petitioner may file a reply brief within 21 days of the filing of the Commonwealth's response.


Summaries of

Smith v. Capozza

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 17, 2022
Civil Action 2:19-cv-03147-JP (E.D. Pa. Mar. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. Capozza

Case Details

Full title:JON SMITH, Petitioner, v. MARK CAPOZZA, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 17, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 2:19-cv-03147-JP (E.D. Pa. Mar. 17, 2022)