From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Capital One Bank (U.S.)

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 13, 2021
3:21-CV-5867-RSL (W.D. Wash. Dec. 13, 2021)

Opinion

3:21-CV-5867-RSL

12-13-2021

DARREN LEE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND RECOMMENDING REVIEW

DAVID W. CHRISTEL, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Because Plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $400 filing fee, Plaintiff financially qualifies for in forma pauperis (IFP) status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Therefore, Plaintiff's IFP application (Dkt. 4) is GRANTED. However, based on the allegations in the proposed complaint and Plaintiff's previous dismissal of this same claim without prejudice, it is unclear if Plaintiff has adequately stated a claim. See No. 3:21-CV-5151-RSL. Therefore, the undersigned recommends review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and to the District Judge assigned to this case.


Summaries of

Smith v. Capital One Bank (U.S.)

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 13, 2021
3:21-CV-5867-RSL (W.D. Wash. Dec. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Smith v. Capital One Bank (U.S.)

Case Details

Full title:DARREN LEE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Dec 13, 2021

Citations

3:21-CV-5867-RSL (W.D. Wash. Dec. 13, 2021)