From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Caddell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jun 30, 2017
Civil Action No. 3:17CV372-HEH (E.D. Va. Jun. 30, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:17CV372-HEH

06-30-2017

DARRYL SMITH, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER CADDELL, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Dismissing Action Without Prejudice)

By Memorandum Order entered on May 24, 2017, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff's action. On June 26, 2017, United States Postal Service returned the May 24, 2017 Memorandum Order to the Court marked, "RETURN TO SENDER," "NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED," and "UNABLE TO FORWARD." Since that date, Plaintiff has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Plaintiff's failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

HENRY E. HUDSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Date: June 30, 2017
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Smith v. Caddell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jun 30, 2017
Civil Action No. 3:17CV372-HEH (E.D. Va. Jun. 30, 2017)
Case details for

Smith v. Caddell

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL SMITH, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER CADDELL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Jun 30, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:17CV372-HEH (E.D. Va. Jun. 30, 2017)