From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Bockhorst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

April, 1929.


Judgment and order reversed upon the law and the facts, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. In view of the sharp conflict of testimony it was prejudicial error to admit in evidence plaintiff's exhibit 1, which on its face is shown to be a self-serving declaration, Rich, Kapper and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P.J., and Hagarty, J., dissent and vote to affirm.


Summaries of

Smith v. Bockhorst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Smith v. Bockhorst

Case Details

Full title:BERTHA SMITH, as Administratrix, etc., of GEORGE M. SMITH, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1929

Citations

226 App. Div. 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)