From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Bobbala

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 17, 2018
No. 2:18-cv-0234 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2:18-cv-0234 CKD P

07-17-2018

ROBERT LEWIS SMITH, Plaintiff, v. BOBBALA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed June 5, 2018, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: July 17, 2018

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
smit0234.fta


Summaries of

Smith v. Bobbala

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 17, 2018
No. 2:18-cv-0234 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2018)
Case details for

Smith v. Bobbala

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LEWIS SMITH, Plaintiff, v. BOBBALA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 17, 2018

Citations

No. 2:18-cv-0234 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2018)