From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Bloodworth

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 29, 1969
170 S.E.2d 429 (Ga. 1969)

Opinion

25420.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 9, 1969.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1969.

Habeas corpus. Bibb Superior Court. Before Judge Morgan.

Mullis Nichols, Gerald S. Mullis, S. Phillip Brown, for appellant.

Jack J. Gautier, District Attorney, Whitney T. Evans, Jr., for appellee.


This appeal was docketed in this court on August, 5, 1969. The appellant's enumeration of errors was not filed until August 19, 1969. Rule 20 of this court requires that the brief of the appellant must be filed with the clerk within ten days after the docketing of the case. Rule 14 of this court provides: "Failure to file enumeration of errors within the time specified in these rules for the filing of briefs may be deemed as failure to perfect the appeal." The appellant having failed to perfect the appeal and no providential cause having been shown for such failure, it is ordered that the appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed.

Appeal dismissed. All the Justices concur.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 9, 1969 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1969.


Summaries of

Smith v. Bloodworth

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 29, 1969
170 S.E.2d 429 (Ga. 1969)
Case details for

Smith v. Bloodworth

Case Details

Full title:SMITH v. BLOODWORTH, Sheriff, et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Sep 29, 1969

Citations

170 S.E.2d 429 (Ga. 1969)
170 S.E.2d 429

Citing Cases

Watson v. Stynchcombe

The appellant having failed to perfect the appeal and no providential cause having been shown for such…

Tucker v. Mir-A-Mar, Inc.

The record in this case discloses that the enumeration of errors was not filed within 20 days from the filing…