From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Bergh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 29, 2021
2:16-CV-10098-TGB-PTM (E.D. Mich. Jan. 29, 2021)

Opinion

2:16-CV-10098-TGB-PTM

01-29-2021

EDWIN SMITH, Petitioner, v. DAVID BERGH, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Opinion and Order issued on this date, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motion for relief from judgment is DENIED (ECF No. 44), motion for reconsideration of the 60(b)(3) fraud claim is DENIED (ECF No. 45), motion for relief pursuant to 60(b) is DENIED (ECF No. 48), and Petitioner's motion seeking to amend motion for evidentiary hearing and motions seeking an evidentiary hearing are DENIED (ECF Nos. 46, 47, 49).

It is FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED and permission to appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED.

Dated at Detroit, Michigan: January 29, 2021

KINIKIA ESSIX

CLERK OF THE COURT

s/A. Chubb

Case Manager and Deputy

Clerk APPROVED:
s/Terrence G. Berg
HON. TERRENCE G. BERG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Bergh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 29, 2021
2:16-CV-10098-TGB-PTM (E.D. Mich. Jan. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Smith v. Bergh

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN SMITH, Petitioner, v. DAVID BERGH, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 29, 2021

Citations

2:16-CV-10098-TGB-PTM (E.D. Mich. Jan. 29, 2021)