From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Bell

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Oct 1, 2024
3:23-cv-140-DPM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 1, 2024)

Opinion

3:23-cv-140-DPM

10-01-2024

BRAD PAUL SMITH ADC #660448 PLAINTIFF v. FELECIA M. BELL, Sergeant, Grimes Unit, ADC DEFENDANT


ORDER

D.P. MARSHALL JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Volpe's well-reasoned, unopposed recommendation, Doc. 38. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). Motion for judgment on the pleadings, Doc. 35, granted. Smith's failure to protect claim against Bell in this case is dismissed without prejudice. Judgment will issue. Any in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Smith v. Bell

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Oct 1, 2024
3:23-cv-140-DPM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 1, 2024)
Case details for

Smith v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:BRAD PAUL SMITH ADC #660448 PLAINTIFF v. FELECIA M. BELL, Sergeant, Grimes…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Oct 1, 2024

Citations

3:23-cv-140-DPM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 1, 2024)