From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Bayshore

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Sep 27, 2023
Civil Action 22-cv-2071 SEC P (W.D. La. Sep. 27, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-cv-2071 SEC P

09-27-2023

EDWIN LEDELL SMITH #87806-280 v. ACTING WARDEN BAYSHORE


PEREZ-MONTES, MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JUDGMENT

TERRY A.DOUGHTY, UNITED STATES DISTRICTJUDGE

For the reasons assigned in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 39] previously filed herein, having thoroughly reviewed the record, noting the lack of objections filed thereto, and concurring with the findings of the Magistrate Judge under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Edwin Ledell Smith's (“Smith”) Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc. No. 1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature because Smith's § 2255 proceedings are currently pending on appeal.


Summaries of

Smith v. Bayshore

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Sep 27, 2023
Civil Action 22-cv-2071 SEC P (W.D. La. Sep. 27, 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. Bayshore

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN LEDELL SMITH #87806-280 v. ACTING WARDEN BAYSHORE

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana

Date published: Sep 27, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 22-cv-2071 SEC P (W.D. La. Sep. 27, 2023)