From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Bank of Am., N.A.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Oct 9, 2014
NO. 02-13-00463-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 9, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 02-13-00463-CV

10-09-2014

LATRICIA SMITH AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS OF 4024 SOUTHERN CHARM COURT, ARLINGTON, TX 76016 APPELLANT v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. APPELLEE


FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. 2013-001982-1
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On September 5, 2014, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ. DELIVERED: October 9, 2014

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Smith v. Bank of Am., N.A.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Oct 9, 2014
NO. 02-13-00463-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 9, 2014)
Case details for

Smith v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Case Details

Full title:LATRICIA SMITH AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS OF 4024 SOUTHERN CHARM COURT…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Oct 9, 2014

Citations

NO. 02-13-00463-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 9, 2014)