From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Baker

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 1, 2022
No. A23A0172 (Ga. Ct. App. Sep. 1, 2022)

Opinion

A23A0172

09-01-2022

CHERYL AMANDA SMITH v. MICHAEL SHANE BAKER.


The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

Michael Shane Baker filed a petition for contempt against Cheryl Amanda Smith, asserting she had wilfully failed to pay child support as required by a June 2018 order. The trial court entered an order on January 28, 2022, finding Smith in contempt, and Smith appeals. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

Appeals from orders in domestic relations cases, including orders holding or declining to hold persons in contempt, must be pursued by discretionary application. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2). "[C]ompliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional." Fabe v. Floyd, 199 Ga.App. 322, 332 (1) (405 S.E.2d 265) (1991). Although OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (11) permits a direct appeal from child custody rulings issued in child custody cases, the order at issue in this appeal does not include any child custody rulings, so it does not fall within the scope of this provision. See Voyles v. Voyles, 301 Ga. 44, 47 (799 S.E.2d 160) (2017). Smith's failure to follow the discretionary appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Baker

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 1, 2022
No. A23A0172 (Ga. Ct. App. Sep. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:CHERYL AMANDA SMITH v. MICHAEL SHANE BAKER.

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 1, 2022

Citations

No. A23A0172 (Ga. Ct. App. Sep. 1, 2022)