From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 26, 2016
Case No. 3:15-cv-00524-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 3:15-cv-00524-RCJ-WGC

01-26-2016

WILLIE T. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. R. BAKER et al., Defendants.


ORDER

I. DISCUSSION

Plaintiff, who is a prisoner in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections ("NDOC"), has submitted a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 1, 1-1). Before the Court screened Plaintiff's complaint, Plaintiff filed a motion for voluntary dismissal. (ECF No. 3). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing "a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Court grants Plaintiff's motion to voluntarily dismiss this action because no responsive pleading has been filed in this case. As such, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice.

II. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that the motion for voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 3) is granted.

It is further ordered that the application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is denied as moot.

It is further ordered that this action is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice.

It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

Dated: This 26th day of January, 2016.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 26, 2016
Case No. 3:15-cv-00524-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2016)
Case details for

Smith v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE T. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. R. BAKER et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 26, 2016

Citations

Case No. 3:15-cv-00524-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2016)