From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 5, 1925
214 Ala. 4 (Ala. 1925)

Opinion

7 Div. 582.

November 5, 1925.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Shelby County; E. S. Lyman, Judge.

Longshore, Koenig Longshore, of Columbiana, and J. Osmond Middleton, of Clanton, for appellant.

Counsel discuss the questions raised and treated, but without citing authorities.

Paul O. Luck, of Columbiana, for appellee.

Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.


Statutory action of detinue for an automobile by appellant against appellee.

Plaintiff had owned the automobile. Defendant's case was that plaintiff had sold the machine to his (plaintiff's) son; that in an action against the son, brought and tried before a justice of the peace, judgment had been rendered for Maxwell, the plaintiff in that case; that execution had been levied on the machine; and that he (defendant) had purchased at a sale thereunder. It was competent for defendant to show title in this way; but defendant was, over apt and timely objections, allowed to adduce parol evidence of the judgment and proceedings in the justice's court, and these rulings were error for which the judgment must be reversed. Jones v. Davis, 2 Ala. 730; Ware v. Roberson, 18 Ala. 108; Watson v. State, 63 Ala. 22; Roach v. Privett, 90 Ala. 396, 7 So. 808, 24 Am. St. Rep. 819; Code, § 8722.

Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 5, 1925
214 Ala. 4 (Ala. 1925)
Case details for

Smith v. Bailey

Case Details

Full title:SMITH v. BAILEY

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Nov 5, 1925

Citations

214 Ala. 4 (Ala. 1925)
106 So. 239

Citing Cases

Walker v. Bailey

Contracts, though in violation of Act, may be enforced as to purchase price. Bruce's Juices v. Amer. Can Co.,…

Summers v. State

What ought to be of record must be proved by the record. Milbra v. Sloss-S. S. I. Co., 182 Ala. 622, 62 So.…