From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Baca

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 28, 2023
3:22-cv-00522-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Aug. 28, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00522-MMD-CSD

08-28-2023

JACOB SMITH, Plaintiff, v. ISIDRO BACA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Re: ECF No. 17

Before the court is Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint. (ECF No. 17.)

Neither the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure nor the Local Rules of Practice permit the filing of a reply to an answer. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(a).

Therefore, Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 17) is STRICKEN.


Summaries of

Smith v. Baca

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 28, 2023
3:22-cv-00522-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Aug. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. Baca

Case Details

Full title:JACOB SMITH, Plaintiff, v. ISIDRO BACA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 28, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-00522-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Aug. 28, 2023)