From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Autovest LLC of Ind.

United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana
Sep 5, 2023
1:22-CV-413-HAB (N.D. Ind. Sep. 5, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-CV-413-HAB

09-05-2023

BRANDON SMITH, Plaintiff, v. AUTOVEST L.L.C. OF INDIANA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

HOLLY A. BRADY CHIEF JUDGE

Plaintiff, by counsel, filed a notice of settlement in March. (ECF No. 5). Since then, Magistrate Judge Collins has issued four orders directing Plaintiff to file dismissal papers. (ECF Nos. 6-9). The last two told Plaintiff that, if he failed to file the dismissal papers, this case would be dismissed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) for failure to complete service of process. (ECF Nos. 8, 9). Plaintiff has ignored each order.

Finally fed up, Magistrate Judge Collins issued a Report and Recommendation in late July recommending that the case be dismissed under Rule 4(m). (ECF No. 10). The time for objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Collins Report and Recommendation and DISMISSES this case under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). Attorney Thomas G. Bradburn is ORDERED to show cause on or before September 15, 2023, why he should not be sanctioned for his repeated failure to follow this Court's orders.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Smith v. Autovest LLC of Ind.

United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana
Sep 5, 2023
1:22-CV-413-HAB (N.D. Ind. Sep. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. Autovest LLC of Ind.

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON SMITH, Plaintiff, v. AUTOVEST L.L.C. OF INDIANA, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana

Date published: Sep 5, 2023

Citations

1:22-CV-413-HAB (N.D. Ind. Sep. 5, 2023)