From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Auburn Police Dep't

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 19, 2023
No. C23-0080-TL (W.D. Wash. Jan. 19, 2023)

Opinion

C23-0080-TL

01-19-2023

RONALD A. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

S. KATE VAUGHAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this matter. Dkt. 1. Because Plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $402.00 filing fee, Plaintiff qualifies for IFP status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Plaintiff's IFP application, Dkt. 1, is therefore GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties and to the assigned District Judge.


Summaries of

Smith v. Auburn Police Dep't

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 19, 2023
No. C23-0080-TL (W.D. Wash. Jan. 19, 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. Auburn Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:RONALD A. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jan 19, 2023

Citations

No. C23-0080-TL (W.D. Wash. Jan. 19, 2023)