From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Oct 29, 2012
CASE NO. 2:10-01985-EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:10-01985-EFB

10-29-2012

CAROLYN A. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

BESS M. BREWER Attorney for Plaintiff BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS CSBN 189450
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

SETTLING ATTORNEY'S FEES

PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS

TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of SIX THOUSAND DOLLARS ($6,00.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees, expenses and costs to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and expenses and costs to Plaintiff's attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees, expenses and costs are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees, expenses and costs is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees, expenses and costs shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Bess M. Brewer, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees, expenses and costs, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees and expenses and costs in connection with this action.

This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the provisions of the EAJA.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________

BESS M. BREWER

Attorney for Plaintiff

[as authorized by email]

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

By: ____________________

THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

____________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Oct 29, 2012
CASE NO. 2:10-01985-EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Smith v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CAROLYN A. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 29, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 2:10-01985-EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2012)