From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Allen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 24, 2022
2:21-cv-02080-TLN-DMC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02080-TLN-DMC

06-24-2022

GILBERT EARL SMITH, Petitioner, v. TRENT ALLEN, acting warden, Salinas Valley State Prison, Soledad, California, Respondent, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Real Party in Interest.


Robert T. Matsui Federal Courthouse

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE AND REPLY MEMORANDUM

(UNOPPOSED)

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Good cause appearing, and the motion being unopposed, this Court grants petitioner a fifth 32-day extension of time to file the traverse and reply memorandum, from Thursday, June 30, 2022, to and including Monday, August 1, 2022.

Proposed Order Granting Extension of Time to File Traverse and Reply Memorandum


Summaries of

Smith v. Allen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 24, 2022
2:21-cv-02080-TLN-DMC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:GILBERT EARL SMITH, Petitioner, v. TRENT ALLEN, acting warden, Salinas…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 24, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-02080-TLN-DMC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)