From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Allen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 6, 2022
2:21-cv-02080-TLN-DMC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02080-TLN-DMC

06-06-2022

GILBERT EARL SMITH, Petitioner, v. TRENT ALLEN, ACTING WARDEN, SALINAS Valley State Prison, Soledad, California, Respondent, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Real Party in Interest.


ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE AND REPLY MEMORANDUM

PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE AND REPLY MEMORANDUM

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Good cause appearing based on counsel's declaration indicating the need for additional time due to a heavily impacted calendar, and the motion being unopposed, this court grants petitioner a 32-day extension of time to file the traverse and reply memorandum, from Tuesday, May 31, 2022, to and including Thursday, June 30, 2022.

The Court notes this is the fourth extension of time to file a traverse, and further requests for additional time will be highly disfavored.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Allen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 6, 2022
2:21-cv-02080-TLN-DMC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:GILBERT EARL SMITH, Petitioner, v. TRENT ALLEN, ACTING WARDEN, SALINAS…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 6, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-02080-TLN-DMC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)