From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Air Serv Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 16, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03286-RPM (D. Colo. Aug. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03286-RPM

08-16-2012

CHERISE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. AIR SERV CORPORATION, Defendant.


Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch


Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith

FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki


Charlotte N. Sweeney

Rachel E. Ellis


Erin A. Webber

Alyson A. Smith


COURTROOM MINUTES

Scheduling Conference

1:56 p.m. Court in session.

ORDERED: Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File its Second Amended Answer [26], is granted. Second Amended Answer filed.

Discussion regarding case facts.
Counsel state their respective positions regarding reasons for termination.

Discussion regarding the EEOC and unemployment.

Discussion regarding discovery.

Court states its view regarding requests for admission and production of documents.
Request to exceed written discovery limit (25) prescribed by the rules is denied.

Court advise counsel that written communications (emails) between counsel are privileged and should not be filed.

Court states its practice regarding orders of reference to magistrate judge for settlement (joint motion).

Scheduling Order signed.

2:17 p.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total time: 21 min.


Summaries of

Smith v. Air Serv Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 16, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03286-RPM (D. Colo. Aug. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Smith v. Air Serv Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CHERISE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. AIR SERV CORPORATION, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 16, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03286-RPM (D. Colo. Aug. 16, 2012)