From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 11, 2014
CASE NO. EDCV 10-1119-GW (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 11, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. EDCV 10-1119-GW (PJW)

11-11-2014

ROBERT LEWIS SMITH, Petitioner, v. DERRAL G. ADAMS, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING AMENDED FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Amended Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Amended Final Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that it erred in its procedural ruling and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 11, 2014.

/s/_________

GEORGE H. WU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 11, 2014
CASE NO. EDCV 10-1119-GW (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 11, 2014)
Case details for

Smith v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LEWIS SMITH, Petitioner, v. DERRAL G. ADAMS, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 11, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. EDCV 10-1119-GW (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 11, 2014)