From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smilie v. Comcast Corp.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Aug 15, 2007
No. 07 C 3231 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 15, 2007)

Opinion

No. 07 C 3231.

August 15, 2007


MEMORANDUM ORDER


At the end of last week Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC ("Comcast," which has been misnamed in the Complaint) filed its Answer to the Complaint. Although that responsive pleading has been meticulous in addressing all of the allegations in the Complaint, one recurrent pleading flaw has prompted this sua sponte memorandum order.

Unlike all too many lawyers (see App. ¶ 1 to State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Riley, 199 F.R.D. 276, 278 (N.D. Ill. 2001)), Comcast's counsel have repeatedly (and properly) invoked the second sentence of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(b) as the basis for getting the benefit of a deemed denial (see Answer ¶¶ 4, 6, 7, 11 and 12 and Answer Count I ¶ 14, Count II ¶¶ 13 and 14 and Count III ¶ 13). But having done so, Comcast's counsel then proceed to follow that invocation with the phrase "and therefore denies those allegations" — an oxymoronic locution, for how can a party that has disclaimed enough information to support a belief as to the truth of an allegation then go on to deny it? Accordingly that phrase is stricken from the Answer wherever it appears.


Summaries of

Smilie v. Comcast Corp.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Aug 15, 2007
No. 07 C 3231 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 15, 2007)
Case details for

Smilie v. Comcast Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DONALD SMILIE, etc., Plaintiff, v. COMCAST CORPORATION, etc., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division

Date published: Aug 15, 2007

Citations

No. 07 C 3231 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 15, 2007)