From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smiley v. Harmoush

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Mar 19, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17cv277 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 19, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17cv277

03-19-2018

DWAYNE ANTHONY SMILEY, SR. v. ISSAM HARMOUSH, ET AL.


MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Dwayne Anthony Smiley, Sr., an inmate at the Federal Correctional Complex in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, brought the above-styled lawsuit.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends the above-styled action be dismissed for want of prosecution.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record and pleadings. Plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. This requires a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).

Plaintiff filed a "NOTICE and DEMAND FOR RECIPIENT COPIES for DISCHARGING SETTELMENT OF ALL ACCOUNTS ISSUED IN THIS CASE ATTRIBUTED TO THE UNITED STATES TREASURY/DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURE FOR THE SUM CERTAIN IN THIS ACCOUNT/CASE; (sic)" Interpreted liberally, plaintiff's notice is construed as objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. --------

After careful consideration, the court concludes plaintiff's objections are without merit. As detailed in the Report, plaintiff contends it is not necessary for him to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis because he submitted a notice to the court that he filed a "BOND" and a "BILL OF EXCHANGE." Additionally, in his objections, plaintiff argues that the court should "[m]ake [Magistrate Judge] Keith Giblin aware that this case is BONDED and NO INFORMA PAUPERIS IS NEEDED IN THIS CASE." Plaintiff refuses to comply with the order of the court to either pay the filing fee or submit a proper application to proceed in forma pauperis. Therefore, the action should be dismissed for want of prosecution.

ORDER

Accordingly, plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendations.

SIGNED this the 19 day of March, 2018.

/s/_________

Thad Heartfield

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Smiley v. Harmoush

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Mar 19, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17cv277 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 19, 2018)
Case details for

Smiley v. Harmoush

Case Details

Full title:DWAYNE ANTHONY SMILEY, SR. v. ISSAM HARMOUSH, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION

Date published: Mar 19, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17cv277 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 19, 2018)