From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smart Workout v. Envil. Ctl. Bd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 9, 2010
79 A.D.3d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 3860.

December 9, 2010.

Three administrative determinations of respondent, dated October 29, 2009, imposing a total of $5,500 in fines for 74 violations of New York City Administrative Code § 10-119, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and this proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Alice Schlesinger, J.], entered June 16, 2010), dismissed, without costs.

Elaine Platt, New York, for petitioner.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Scott Shorr of counsel), for respondent

Before: Gonzalez, P.J., Saxe, Catterson, Acosta and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.


Petitioner failed to offer any admissible evidence to refute the testimony of respondent's agents that violations had been issued only for those handbills affixed to City property. Thus, the Board's determination was supported by substantial evidence and must be confirmed, ( see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176; cf. Matter of Sulzer v Environmental Control Bd. of City of N.Y., 165 AD2d 270, 280).

We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Smart Workout v. Envil. Ctl. Bd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 9, 2010
79 A.D.3d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Smart Workout v. Envil. Ctl. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:SMART WORKOUT, INC., Petitioner, v. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD OF THE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 9, 2010

Citations

79 A.D.3d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 9075
911 N.Y.S.2d 630

Citing Cases

Cheong Mei Inc. v. Environmental Control Board

Although petitioner's name did not itself appear on the face of the numerous handbills that were unlawfully…

CBA Industries, Inc. v. Beddoe

Petitioner's contention that it should not be held liable for the acts of an independent subcontractor that…