From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smart v. Wilson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 24, 2012
471 F. App'x 165 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-7411

04-24-2012

ROBERT DALE SMART, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALAN WILSON, SC Att. General; BRADFORD CRANSHAW, Attorney; JOHN BELTON WHITE, Attorney; SAM WHITE, Public Safety Dir.; DR. RAVENELL SMITH, Defendants - Appellees.

Robert Dale Smart, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:11-cv-02087-GRA)

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Dale Smart, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert Dale Smart appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and disimssing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smart v. Wilson, No. 2:11-cv-02087-GRA (D.S.C. Oct. 11, 2011). We deny Smart's motions to amend the caption and for default judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No amendment to Smart's complaint could save his action; thus, the district court's dismissal without prejudice is a final, appealable order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066 (4th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Smart v. Wilson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 24, 2012
471 F. App'x 165 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Smart v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT DALE SMART, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALAN WILSON, SC Att. General…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 24, 2012

Citations

471 F. App'x 165 (4th Cir. 2012)