From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smart v. Parama

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 28, 2016
Case No. CV 13-08311-GW (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-08311-GW (DTB)

06-28-2016

ARTHUR LEE SMART, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMA, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. / / / / / / / / /

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. Dated: June 28, 2016

/s/_________

GEORGE H. WU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smart v. Parama

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 28, 2016
Case No. CV 13-08311-GW (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2016)
Case details for

Smart v. Parama

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR LEE SMART, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMA, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 28, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 13-08311-GW (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2016)