From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smart v. Johnson

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 20, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1706 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 20, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1706.

October 20, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 20th day of October, 2010, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1), the Respondents' Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart and the petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that:

1. The petitioner's objections are OVERRULED;

2. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hart is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and,

4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

Smart v. Johnson

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 20, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1706 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 20, 2010)
Case details for

Smart v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:AKILAH SMART v. MR. J. BARRY JOHNSON, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 20, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1706 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 20, 2010)