Opinion
Civil Action No. 12-7782 (RBK)
01-15-2013
SALAHUDDIN SMART, Plaintiff, v. CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants.
Plaintiff pro se Salahuddin Smart Camden County Correctional Facility
MEMORANDUM OPINION
APPEARANCES:
Plaintiff pro se
Salahuddin Smart
Camden County Correctional Facility
KUGLER, District Judge
Plaintiff Salahuddin Smart, a pre-trial detainee confined at Camden County Correctional Facility in Camden, New Jersey, seeks to bring this civil action in forma pauperis, without prepayment of fees or security, asserting claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Plaintiff submitted the instruction sheet of a form Affidavit of Poverty and an uncertified institutional account statement. The Court construes this submission as a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
Prior to this action, Plaintiff has initiated more than forty civil actions in this District over the period of the last ten years and, in at least twenty-one of those actions, Plaintiff had his in forma pauperis status revoked.
Excluding this matter, the indices of the civil actions filed by Plaintiff in this District include (the actions in which Plaintiff had his in forma pauperis status revoked are marked by an asterisk): 02-5628*, 02-5826*, 02-6090*, 02-6091*, 02-6094*, 03-0954*, 03-1488*, 03-1489*, 03-4670*, 03-4743*, 03-5064*, 03-5247*, 03-5344*, 03-5345*, 03-5376*, 03-5377*, 03-5378*, 03-5495, 03-5572*, 03-5573, 03-5574, 03-6062*, 03-6063*, 03-6064, 03- 6065, 03-6066, 03-6195, 04-0157, 04-0453, 04-1860, 04-1861, 04-4424, 04-4960, 04-4961, 04-5015, 05-1777, 06-0138, 07-0955, 07-6102, 07-6103, 08-0181, 08-2258*, 08-2259, 09-0593, 11-0276, 11-0743, 11-0996,.
Civil actions brought in forma pauperis are governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-135, 110 Stat. 1321 (April 26, 1996) (the "PLRA"), which amends 28 U.S.C. § 1915, establishes certain financial requirements for prisoners who are attempting to bring a civil action or file an appeal in forma pauperis.
Under the PLRA, a prisoner seeking to bring a civil action in forma pauperis must submit an affidavit, including a statement of all assets and liabilities, which establishes that the prisoner is unable to pay the fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The prisoner also must submit a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement(s) for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). The prisoner must obtain this certified statement from the appropriate official of each correctional facility at which he was or is confined during such six-month period. Id.
Even if the prisoner is granted in forma pauperis status, the prisoner must pay the full amount of the $350 filing fee in installments. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). In each month that the amount in the prisoner's account exceeds $10.00, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid, the agency having custody of the prisoner shall assess, deduct from the prisoner's account, and forward to the Clerk of the Court an installment payment equal to 20 % of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).
Plaintiff does not appear to have been confined at the time he brought most of his prior civil actions. Accordingly, Plaintiff may not have known when he submitted his complaint that he must pay the filing fee, and that even if the full filing fee, or any part of it, has been paid, the Court must dismiss the case if it finds that the action: (1) is frivolous or malicious; (2) fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (3) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (in forma pauperis actions). See also 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (dismissal of actions in which prisoner seeks redress from a governmental defendant); 42 U.S.C. § 1997e (dismissal of prisoner actions brought with respect to prison conditions). If the Court dismisses the case for any of these reasons, the PLRA does not suspend installment payments of the filing fee or permit the prisoner to get back the filing fee, or any part of it, that has already been paid.
In this action, Plaintiff failed to submit a complete in forma pauperis application as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), (2). See, e.g., Tyson v. Youth Ventures, L.L.C., 42 Fed.Appx. 221 (10th Cir. 2002); Johnson v. United States, 79 Fed.Cl. 769 (2007).
The allegations of the Complaint do not suggest that Plaintiff is in imminent danger of serious physical injury.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied without prejudice and the Clerk of the Court will be ordered to administratively terminate this action, without filing the complaint or assessing a filing fee. Plaintiff will be granted leave to apply to re-open within 30 days.
Such an administrative termination is not a "dismissal" for purposes of the statute of limitations, and if the case is reopened pursuant to the terms of the accompanying Order, it is not subject to the statute of limitations time bar if it was originally filed timely. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988) (prisoner mailbox rule); McDowell v. Delaware State Police, 88 F.3d 188, 191 (3d Cir. 1996); see also Williams-Guice v. Board of Education, 45 F.3d 161, 163 (7th Cir. 1995).
--------
An appropriate Order will be entered.
______________________
Robert B. Kugler
United States District Judge